ࡱ> ]_\ +bjbj +D["ZZ11118i,1ZO"qqqqqql<-qqqquqqyRqqq5`^ 1:M0U,JJqqqZ :   Pornography & obscenity Pornography refers to material dealing with sex designed to arouse its readers or viewers. Websters Dictionary defines pornography as writings, pictures, etc. intended primarily to arouse sexual desire. There are two types of pornography that receive no First Amendment protection obscenity and child pornography. The First Amendment generally protects pornography that does not fall into one of these two categories at least for adult viewers. Sometimes, material is classified as harmful to minors even though adults can have access to the same material. Even a 1986 Attorney General Commission Report on Pornography said that not all pornography is legally obscene. The question becomes what types of pornography cross the line into the unprotected categories of obscenity and child pornography. Or to put it another way, courts often struggle with whether pornography is too hard core. Obscenity remains one of the most controversial and confounding areas of First Amendment law. U.S. Supreme Court justices have struggled mightily through the years to define it. Justice Potter Stewart could provide no definition in HYPERLINK "http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=378&invol=184"Jacobellis v. Ohio other than exclaiming: I know it when I see it. In that 1964 decision, Stewart also said that the Court was faced with the task of trying to define what may be indefinable. Justice Hugo Black expressed his frustration with determining whether certain pornography could be prohibited under the First Amendment when he wrote in HYPERLINK "http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=383&invol=502"Mishkin v. State of N.Y.: I wish once more to express my objections to saddling this Court with the irksome and inevitably unpopular and unwholesome task of finally deciding by a case-by-case, sight-by-sight personal judgment of the members of this Court what pornography (whatever that means) is too hard core for people to see or read. After grappling with the obscenity problem in many cases during the late 1950s and early 1960s, the Supreme Court laid out basic guidelines for jurors in obscenity cases in its 1973 decision HYPERLINK "http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=413&invol=15"Miller v. California. These include: Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest. Whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law. Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value. The Court reasoned that individuals could not be convicted of obscenity charges unless the materials depict patently offensive hard core sexual conduct. This means that many materials dealing with sex, including pornographic magazines, books, and movies, simply do not qualify as legally obscene. Even more fundamentally, nudity does not equal obscenity. The Supreme Court recognized this in HYPERLINK "http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=418&invol=153"Jenkins v. Georgia, when it ruled that the film Carnal Knowledge was not obscene. Justice William Rehnquist wrote in that 1974 case that nudity alone is not enough to make material legally obscene under the Miller standards. Child pornography( Another type of pornography that receives no First Amendment protection is child pornography. In 1982, the Supreme Court ruled in HYPERLINK "http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=458&invol=747"New York v. Ferber that states could prohibit child pornography even if somehow the material in question did not meet the Miller obscenity standard. The high court noted that a work taken as a whole could have serious artistic value but also embody the hardest core of child pornography. The high court determined that the state had a compelling interest to prevent the sexual exploitation of minors in the making of child pornography. The Court called such an interest one of surpassing importance. The Court did recognize that child-pornography laws could be applied in a heavy-handed way: Like obscenity statutes, laws directed at the dissemination of child pornography run the risk of suppressing protected expression by allowing the hand of the censor to become unduly heavy. In the 1990 case Osborne v. Ohio, the high court ruled that a state could punish even the private possession and viewing of child pornography. The defendant argued that the state was punishing a thought crime, but the majority of the Court disagreed. Rather, Ohio has enacted [the law] in order to protect the victims of child pornography; it hopes to destroy a market for the exploitative use of children. Not all child pornography statutes are immune from First Amendment challenge. In April 2002, the Court struck down two provisions of the 1996 Child Pornography Prevention Act in HYPERLINK "http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=00-795"Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition. CPPA expanded the definition of child pornography to include any visual depiction that is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct. The other challenged provision banned any sexually explicit material that is advertised or promoted in a way that conveys the impression that a minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct. In other words, the appears to be a minor and conveys the impression clauses of the CPPA classified certain material as child pornography even though no actual minors were involved. The government asserted that it needed these provisions to target so-called virtual child pornography. The government argued the law was needed to keep pace with technology that it was becoming harder to determine if certain images contained pictures of actual children. However, the majority of the Court was bothered by the breadth of the language in CPPA. The justices noted that the law could theoretically be applied to certain Hollywood movies that use youthful adult actors in sexual scenes or even to Renaissance paintings. The Court noted that CPPA proscribes a significant universe of speech that is neither obscene under Miller nor child pornography under Ferber. Congress responded to the Courts decision in Free Speech Coalition by passing the Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools to end the Exploitation of Children Today Act of 2003, better known as the PROTECT Act. The purpose of the law was to restore the governments ability to prosecute child pornography offenses successfully. Prosecutors and legislators warned about the ability of defendants in child-porn cases to raise the virtual child porn defense, arguing that the images in question did not contain pictures of actual minors. A February 2003 HYPERLINK "http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_reports&docid=f:sr002.108.pdf"Senate report on the PROTECT Act said prosecution of child pornography became more difficult for prosecutors because of the Free Speech Coalition ruling. Many prosecutions, in fact, were dismissed, the report stated. And even the prosecutions that remain have been significantly and adversely affected by the decision because prosecutors need to devote significantly more resources to each child pornography case than ever before. The PROTECT Act, which was signed into law in April 2003, amended child- pornography laws in several ways. First, it created a new definition of child pornography to include pornographic pictures of children that are virtually indistinguishable from actual children. It also requires defendants to prove that the images they possess or distribute were not made with and do not depict actual children. The PROTECT Act also created a new pandering offense by prohibiting offers to sell, trade or buy material purported to depict actual or obscene child pornography. The Supreme Court rejected a First Amendment challenge to this pandering provision from constitutional challenge in HYPERLINK "http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=06-694"U.S. v. Williams (2008). Offers to engage in illegal transactions are categorically excluded from First Amendment protection, the Court wrote. Offers to deal in illegal products or otherwise engage in illegal activity do not acquire First Amendment protection when the offeror is mistaken about the factual predicate of his offer. (See also HYPERLINK "http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/virtual-child-pornography"Virtual child pornography.) PAGE  PAGE 1 uR T GHijijijijrUij8h?hi,6>*B*CJOJQJ]^JaJ phwh/jh?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ )jh?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ &h?hi,6CJOJQJ]^JaJ h?hi,CJOJQJ^JaJ hi,CJOJQJ^JaJ )hi,5B* CJOJQJ\^JaJ$ph G/h?hi,5B* CJOJQJ\^JaJ$ph G 6T4!"$&|(+++ &`#$gdi, & F 01$7$8$H$^`0gdi, 1$7$8$H$gdi, $1$7$8$H$a$gdi,%&6FGҵҤҤҵҤ{mҤUҵҤmA&h?hi,5CJOJQJ\^JaJ /jh?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ hi,CJOJQJ^JaJ h?hi,CJOJQJ^JaJ"/jh?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ h?hi,CJOJQJ^JaJ 8h?hi,6>*B*CJOJQJ]^JaJ phwh)jh?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ /j h?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ X^BC45!!""""$$$$2%ڥkڥڃ/j+h?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ hi,CJOJQJ^JaJ &h?hi,6CJOJQJ]^JaJ 8h?hi,6>*B*CJOJQJ]^JaJ phwh/j"h?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ )jh?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ h?hi,CJOJQJ^JaJ $2%3%4%T%U%%%&&|(}())))) * ***W+X++ҸҧҧmPҧҧ8h?hi,6>*B*CJOJQJ]^JaJ phwh/jh?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ hi,CJOJQJ^JaJ &h?hi,6CJOJQJ]^JaJ h?hi,CJOJQJ^JaJ 2h?hi,>*B*CJOJQJ^JaJ phwh)jh?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ /jPh?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ ++++++++++++++++++++Ҹҧwhi,0JmHnHuhi, hi,0Jjhi,0JU h'$hi,CJOJQJ^JaJ h?hi,CJOJQJ^JaJ 2h?hi,>*B*CJOJQJ^JaJ phwh)jh?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ /jh?hi,CJOJQJU^JaJ ++++++++ 1$7$8$H$gdi, &`#$gdi,h]hgdi,)0P:pi,/ =!"#$% DyK yK http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=378&invol=184 DyK yK http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=383&invol=502DyK yK http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=413&invol=15 DyK yK http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=418&invol=153 DyK yK http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=458&invol=747%DyK yK http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=00-7953DyK yK http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_reports&docid=f:sr002.108.pdf%DyK yK http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=06-694DyK yK |http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/virtual-child-pornography666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~ OJPJQJ_HmH nH sH tH H`H YuNormal CJOJQJ_HaJmH sH tH DA`D Default Paragraph FontRiR Table Normal4 l4a (k ( No List 4@4 ?0Header  !>/> ?0 Header CharCJOJQJaJ.)@. ?0 Page NumberPK!K[Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢]yl#!MB;BQޏaLSWyҟ^@ Lz]__CdR{`L=r85v&mQ뉑8ICX=H"Z=&JCjwA`.Â?U~YkG/̷x3%o3t\&@w!H'"v0PK!֧6 _rels/.relsj0 }Q%v/C/}(h"O = C?hv=Ʌ%[xp{۵_Pѣ<1H0ORBdJE4b$q_6LR7`0̞O,En7Lib/SeеPK!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xml M @}w7c(EbˮCAǠҟ7՛K Y, e.|,H,lxɴIsQ}#Ր ֵ+!,^$j=GW)E+& 8PK!\theme/theme/theme1.xmlYOoE#F{o'NDuر i-q;N3' G$$DAč*iEP~wq4;{o?g^;N:$BR64Mvsi-@R4Œ mUb V*XX! cyg$w.Q "@oWL8*Bycjđ0蠦r,[LC9VbX*x_yuoBL͐u_. DKfN1엓:+ۥ~`jn[Zp֖zg,tV@bW/Oټl6Ws[R?S֒7 _כ[֪7 _w]ŌShN'^Bxk_[dC]zOլ\K=.:@MgdCf/o\ycB95B24S CEL|gO'sקo>W=n#p̰ZN|ӪV:8z1f؃k;ڇcp7#z8]Y / \{t\}}spķ=ʠoRVL3N(B<|ݥuK>P.EMLhɦM .co;əmr"*0#̡=6Kր0i1;$P0!YݩjbiXJB5IgAФ޲a6{P g֢)҉-Ìq8RmcWyXg/u]6Q_Ê5H Z2PU]Ǽ"GGFbCSOD%,p 6ޚwq̲R_gJS֣9)嗛(:/ak;6j11太x~<:ɮ>O&kNa4dht\?J&l O٠NRpwhpse)tp)af] 27n}mk]\S,+a2g^Az )˙>E G鿰L7)'PK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-!K[Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 1_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!\theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] u"D 2%++ ++!G % F tAd], !:"W"u"XXXXXXXXX !!]"]" !!["s"v" V ["s"v"::h.i,@( u"p@pp0@UnknownGTimes New Roman5Symbol3 Arial7Georgia3Times7Cambria 1h g gT<4"@H?'?0 Ken Nuger  Oh+'02   , 8DLT\d' Normal.dotm Ken Nuger4Microsoft Macintosh Word@2~@ݖ@U~TG0PICT0b HHb bHHAbb !! Ƣ Ƣ Ƣ Ƣ ƢưkZưw Ƣ Ƣ Ƣ+w{swswIJvFUVRVVNVN^VNvBZVw9wZ=ZNVVNZRJU^Gc:wc:g[g[g:^JvRk|_B4_g:^wZwg;_g;c:g:g:g;^g: Ƣ Ƣ9{{{{{{{{{Ns^cg9g9kZcg9VcskZcZ^g9o{s^kZg9^cVw^cg9cZg9g9o{g9^Ro{kZg9cwVg9cg9cg9ckZ{:kZo{^o{g9g9JRo{ZZcg9o{o{kZkZg9o{g9o{kZs^kZZg9o{kZ^^sg9kZ^kZ^cVskZkZ^o{o{g9o{s^g9kZcJRkZ^kZkZo{g9{Mw{o{wo{s {wwkZws{o{o{w6^RZJRZNsccV^^RRVJRZVg9VRsZJRRRVVR{cV^RZNsVRsVccR^JRcJRNsZVNso{RNs^JRV{ {s{{w{w{w{{w{ww{w{w{w{w{{ww{{w{{wwwcsw{w{kZ9g9o{kZg9kZkZo{VkZo{kZso{{g9kZkZcc^kZkZo{g9g9kZ^o{g9o{o{kZg9o{ckZco{g9g9ckZ^o{g9ckZkZo{kZZcwco{<^Z^cg9^RcZ^Zg9g9kZVsZckZg9V^V^sVcg9^cg9^^s^ckZw^cZkZVcVckZcZkZcZVkZ^^{^g9Kwww{sw{{wwwww{3g9V^R^Rg9g9VZZcZg9RZV7so{wso{wwsswo{so{wo{swsw{(VVkZkZg9so{kZg9wZo{o{w^kZckZkZ{o{^kZkZg9g9o{kZg9g9kZkZVg9sg9Zo{^{ckZ Zo{so{g9s^VkZkZg9{g9kZZg9csc^g9{g9^kZo{g9g9Rc^skZkZ^kZg9cNskZV^^g9g9kZg9ZZ{cckZg9ccskZZo{g9o{g9ckZm{{{w{{w{sw swwo{s{so{ ssg9wg9w{o{VNsRcRZRVo{VV^JRZRcJRo{w^R%ZRcJR^sRZZc^ZRVZg9^R^NscRRcNscJR^wwg9JRVVVZJR|wsswswwcwswo{wsswskZo{sswo{wo{kZwswg9cwg9so{o{{{wsswswwcc^g9g9s^cc^^sZcc^^kZccg9Vg9wVkZcRg9Zg9VRg9c^o{g9{cZVNso{g9VVkZZc^^kZckZZ^c^g9Vsco{ckZo{o{kZwo{kZso{g9wo{g9kZg9o{{ckZg9g9skZkZcwg9o{skZ{o{^o{kZssg9kZo{g9sg9o{o{so{kZo{co{o{{w{s{s{{g9o{{ s{{kZkZ{{w{{w{kZ{{{sg9sg9{swo{{{skZkZ{w{o{s{s{^B^B^JRR9VcRNsZRNsV^cJR^^g9VZB^JRJR^F1^F1Zo{NsZF1^^JRZF1o{RJR^g9F1ccJRcRF1VJRVVJRRRZcV{[{w{ss{so{o{s{{o{o{wo{{wg9^cg9g9RwkZZckZg9^kZ^wwVZg9kZo{ckZcg9Ro{co{cg9o{^kZckZo{g9VkZ^kZcg9g9ckZsVw^kZcg9kZckZ^^cw o{kZJRZkZZ{kZg9g9^kZwkZo{cso{Rg9kZg9^kZ^o{o{ckZ^g9kZkZo{o{cwcZg9kZg9o{cRkZg9o{^^Zg9cRkZZ{g g9o{w{{wo{{{o{{wkZo{so{kZwo{o{AcV^NsRsF1^Rg9cF1VkZVNsZg9^F1Zo{NsZNsVNs^JRRVZRccVNsZNsZJRZVRg9^c^RNsNsVVZF1^sNsZNsc^ZJRZR {w{{wsww{wwwswswg9w{{w{ww{w{wkZo{w{w{w o{sww{wws{so{kZo{g9kZ6o{Vo{kZc^o{g9kZwkZg9g9kZg9wkZo{kZg9Vo{kZso{kZkZwwkZo{g9kZcssZ^kZkZ{o{^g9skZg9^sskZV^scZg9ccZV^^ZZg9g9wg9g9o{kZZkZcVkZ o{Vg9ZkZV^g9Zg9VkZo{g9kZVkZcg9kZZkZZco{cZg9cRNsZkZZg9kZW ws{swwo{{w{ o{s{w{{sww]&cZJR^ZRZVwNs^R^RZcZZNs^RsZg9^V^o{wJRVc^g9^RZV{Y{{o{so{csswskZ^so{^skZs{wswo{o{sswsswswu^JRo{kZ-ckZZwo{g9kZco{g9co{{kZco{wg9^g9ZkZwco{g9o{g9skZg9o{^co{kZg9g9kZcVkZco{g9w3g9^kZ^g9g9ZkZckZkZcg9Z^cZcsc^c{^kZkZg9Zw^g9^^kZkZg9^kZcckZkZckZcZVw^Zg9o{[skZ{o{so{{ws{so{ws{wskZ{ g9^NscJRVZR^JRcRkZZ*Ro{Ns^ccZRZsZNs^VR^NsZNsV^cg9RRkZcsZo{kZNs^NsZV^NsZg9o{^Rxwwsws{o{sso{wg9g9sswsssww{swswwo{{ws{sw o{cwswo{sswwsw{CkZkZsg9g9o{o{w^skZswsg9kZkZo{sZo{kZo{g9sg9ckZcZo{o{^o{kZso{o{^wg9Zo{wsso{kZskZs{Vs^cso{o{kZcso{ckZo{o{g9RZg9R^^kZg9V^^kZ^g9g9RV/Z^o{VcNsV^cVg9o{c^^g9RRckZg9RZ{Z^Vg9^kZckZRZcVg9ZkZg9wZg9VZccZqkZw{o{wg9sso{wswwkZw{{swww{{ww{sCcVg9F1cZwNs^ZRc^Ns{^VcVVwR^Z^^NscwRg9kZR^ZRg9Nsg9VckZ^^{Vg?c?ZcVZ^cw^c_VZg_kZNs^Vcg9>s{skZo{o{o{so{wo{o{s{o{o{skZo{{^so{wskZo{{kZs{kZo{skZskZo{o{swo{o{k_^^Z_^_Z^k_^g?c_cZg?wo{swo{^wsw cwo{o{skZws{kZg9g9s&wwo{o{ww^ws{g9{ww{o{o{g9{g9wkZ^wkZso{g9wo{kZwkZwo{wo{g9VZNsg9^ZVZNscJRcNsZRw^cZZNs^cg9"^NsZZg9^kZRVkZg9Z{Nsg9g9^RNsZRVZcZNsVZVRcJRsi{{w{kZwwww{ww{wwww{w{{cJRg9^c^c^o{VccwccZccVkZRsRg9ccsc$ZkZcc^wg9^^c^^kZcZVkZcZcsZccRo{ckZZZkZZ^g9ckZssg9o{o{sco{ckZkZwg9kZco{skZg9g9{g9o{o{so{kZkZg9s{kZ{{g9g9o{o{kZwskZg9sskZg9{g9g9o{cwkZwkZg9c^so{w {kZsg9w{{g9{{s{&g9{s{g9{g9s{{g9kZ{swg9{wg9{{kZkZ{w{ZkZ{{kZ{{w{wo{g9w{AcF1RZF1VsNsRZNs^^BRVwJRVsF1RRNs^F1VRF1RZ{sJRZVBZRsVF1ZJRVsBZJRVJRo{ZRJRVRNsRNsZg9JRZVA{{s{{{g9kZ{{{c,g9ccg9Zg9co{o{g9ZZo{o{VVkZ^g9^g9^kZ^kZwcZkZcRg9^g9sg9^ZkZg9^{^kZcg9ckZ^^g9wg9g9kZVo{g9Vg9wo{o{^g9kZg9cg9cco{so{g9co{kZ^kZo{cg9^kZ^Vsg9g9kZo{cg9g9o{o{kZg9o{cwRkZg9o{^cVg9cRkZZ{kZg9kZ^kZo{ckZws{g9so{ o{{o{o{o{{{s{s{s{o{ wwwsk_oo{!cF1ZRZJR^F1ZVcZNsNsZNsZc^JRkZ^ZZR^o{ZF1VZF1^JRRVkZRRZRRsF1ZsJRRZJR^o{JRcsNVZRRVcg_ZwkZw{w{ww{{ww{sw{{ww{w{{w{{ww{wswsw{{{w{sw{wwwkg?g_g_ck_g_g?k$g?Zog?owkc?k_Z{Vw{kZco{kZcZssg9o{kZo{sg9sg9o{wckZwkZo{kZo{o{sg9o{wkZZ^kZkZg9co{g9o{kZo{wo{kZkZ^Ns^g9o{wCcF^VF^Rg?J~ZZVc?Vg>g9kZkZV^kZkZZ^g9g9kZ^cZg9wcckZkZZ^g9^Z^kZcZ{^cV^g9kZZkZV^o{g9o{^Vg9V^c^Vo{mwo{wwo{{wwg9wo{ww{o{wkZ{o{ww{{o{o{{} ^NsVRcsNsVNsVkZNsZJR^JRkZ^NsRNsRNsRNskZRNsJR{F1VJR^JRRRsJRZF1ZNsRRF1VRsRBcg9y{w{{{ w{{w{{w{w{w{ww{w{{{w{{o{{{kZ{wkZ{www{{sg9o{g9ZkZkZZg9kZo{co{kZg9kZo{^{g9^ckZcVwg9^kZ^g9Vg9o{sVkZwkZwo{kZo{o{ckZo{wo{kZo{^g9^g9ckZkZwkZcVo{kZkZZkZ^c Zg9ZkZZg9g9kZZcZw^kZ$ZZg9ZwcZcg9c^cVkZc^Zo{g9^Zo{g9kZg9kZkZ^^g9scR^^kZg9o{cRVkZkZis{s{wwo{{s{o{wo{wkZ{s{{s{cNsZ^VVZRg9g9NscNsR^NsV^cg9JRkZZVcg9RZV"NsZZkZVVc^NsZg9s^VRRwNsVZZc^NsRV^RVZRcNs^^g9wsw so{wkZo{wccwsswso{ws"wsw{sw{so{sswwswwwsswcwwswsZso{csswkZo{kZco{kZo{kZkZ^o{o{skZo{so{kZwg9{g9o{o{sg9o{kZ^wo{o{kZo{kZwkZsso{g9kZwg9swso{wso{wkZo{sZwo{>g9g9^ZVg9Zg9Zg9kZcZ^o{cZZVg9VcsVo{^^Vs^Vg9Vo{cZg9VkZg9VRZcR^VwVg9kZVZsc^w^^ZVw]{ssw{w{sswswwwww{wwCo{ZJRcZs^^ZV^RcVZsZ^VRccVkZkZNsZV^cVZVscVcNsV^ZZwRg9g9ZcVcckZcZV^o{ZZV^cZkZcNs^{$wo{kZso{s^skZZco{o{kZR{o{wo{kZwo{o{wwo{o{so{skZo{g9{^o{wo{{kZsso{o{kZo{swo{kZo{s{o{o{kZss^kZskZo{}kZwkZwsso{w{wsg9{wwo{^{sskZso{wkZ^w{^sw{kZo{wwo{o{g9wo{^{swo{g9cwwkZw;g9NsZ^g9g9R^RVo{ZRVsVNscZkZccJRRZVwcJRZo{RZVNscVcNso{^c^Rcg9g9NsNs^g9V^g9cRNsR^q{wso{wsw{wsw{{s{{{{{{{swg9c^g9RZcVg9ZswV^sc!^c^kZg9o{cZZcc^kZNsg9sg9^cZckZg9o{Rg9wg9Vcg9o{Z^c ZkZZVZZZg?g_osB^cg9kZg9o{kZg9kZo{{{g9kZ{cg9sg9skZso{skZo{kZg9kZkZo{cckZckZkZo{so{sg9o{wo{Zso{kZg9kZkZo{kZg9o{co^VZR^k_^c? so{k_g_w{{wws^g9{s{{kZ{g9{C_cZR_R_^J~^c^F1ZRRsBVZJRNsRNsssokk_g?kom.{F1cg9kZVkZg9{VkZso{o{kZkZo{kZkZskZg9kZsg9s{g9g9kZZkZg9o{wo{kZg9g9kZkZg9g9kZo{g9kZikZkZg9o{cckZccwco{kZo{cRkZg9g9kZo{g9sV^kZ^kZg9VwkZg9cg9kZkZVg9g9kZcg9O{{w sww{ww{{ww{{ww9^RRcVRR^V^sRVR^RZNscZZcRVg9cRVccNsZccNsZkZVZZVZVV^Ro{ZsVkZZNscVZo{{ws{w{{{ww{{w{w{ww{{ww{{ww{w {www{{w{EskZkZssg9{o{so{^swo{kZo{kZskZo{skZkZo{o{so{G^VZ^^g9kZcg9o{^^kZg9^ZkZcZo{o{Z^cg9ckZ{a {{{sw{{{{{{{w{w{s{{F1^Zg9NsZ^{NsZs^Zg9Nso{kZR^Zg9^o{^co{Vc^Vcg9ZkZ^o{^ZZ^Rcg9kZRccVg9^co{p {wsso{sso{s{wswwo{g9s{swwo{swwswwswo{ so{wssw{swsswsws{wsw o{wwswo{wo{swwo{g9swkZkZ{{kZkZo{swg9o{s{sg9w{scwwg9kZw{s{kZww^cckZsVg9Z^ZkZcVZ^ZVg9sVV^ckZVg9Vg9R^cZZVo{kZg9kZV^o{Ns^cVcVZZkZc^VZwZ^c{-ww{{w{{ Ƣ Ƣ Ƣ Ƣ Ƣ Ƣ Ƣ Ƣ Ƣ Ƣ Ƣ w ՜.+,D՜.+,D hp  'San Jose State University<"  Title 8@ _PID_HLINKS'Ax65G>http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/virtual-child-pornographypP9Zhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=06-694pP1,ahttp://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_reports&docid=f:sr002.108.pdfpP?Zhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=00-795pPC~ Lhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=458&invol=747pPA{ Lhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=418&invol=153pPy{Khttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=413&invol=15pPHwLhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=383&invol=502pPApLhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=378&invol=184pP  !"$%&'()*,-./0123456789;<=>?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSUVWXYZ[^Root Entry F `Data #1Table+ZWordDocument+DSummaryInformation(:L2DocumentSummaryInformation8TCompObj` F Microsoft Word 97-2004 DocumentNB6WWord.Document.8