ࡱ> 02/ Jbjbjߍ .J =====QQQQeQ0yyyyyTTT       ,v d9=TTTTT9==yyNT@=y=y T Vs@7q: d0x  7=7TTT99TTT TTTTTTTTT :   ScWk 242 Assignment 3: Quantitative Article Critique Guidelines Choose one of the following ScWk 240 quantitative articles to critique: McLaughlin, D. P., & McFarland, K. (2011). A randomized trial of a group based cognitive behavior therapy program for older adults with epilepsy: the impact on seizure frequency, depression and psychosocial well-being. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 34, 201-207. Bradshaw, W., & Roseborough, D. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral treatment of residual symptoms and impairment in Schizophrenia. Research on Social Work Practice, 14(2) 112-120. Write a 3 to 4 page (double-spaced), APA formatted article critique that addresses the following topics (adapted from Greenhalgh, 2006): What was the research question(s) or hypothesis(es) and why was the study needed? Assess how well the authors review previous research on the topic and provide a context for the need for the study. What were the research design and methods? Assess the extent to which the research design and methods were able to answer the research question or hypothesis. Consider any alternative designs and methods that could also be used to answer the research question or hypothesis. What variables were measured and how were they measured? Assess the quality of these measurements by discussing their reliability and validity. If applicable: identify the independent and dependent variables. Are there other variables that may be important, but were not included in the analysiswhat are they? Who is the study about? Consider the following questions: how were the participants recruited, who may have been excluded from the study and how might that affect the findings? Were the participants studied in real-life circumstances? Was the study original and how does it contribute to knowledge on this topic? Consider the following questions: does the study approach the topic in a new or innovative way? Is the study larger, or continued for a longer period of time than other studies? Are the methods more rigorous or address shortcomings of other studies? Do you agree with the authors interpretation of the findings? Why or why not? Consider the following questions: are there other interpretations that should have been included? Were the limitations of the study adequately discussed? Assignment is worth 15 points.  #@ABgs3 4 e g 6 Z g h i j k ü}um}ih{^h9}hr5h9}hRD5h9}h{^5hx3h6hx3]hhx36] hhx3 h6]hKh`] h`6h6h` hKh` h`]h9}h`5h9}h'a5h'ahrh'aCJaJhrh`5CJaJhrh'a5CJaJ'@AB j k gdRD 87$8$H$^8gdRD  & F7$8$H$gdRD 7$8$H$gd{^ 7$8$H$^gd6 7$8$H$`gd6  & F7$8$H$gd'a 7$8$H$gdO $7$8$H$a$gd'a    $ ( ) G N W z  a   CDE>@})*+IJh9}h9}5 h9}5hJ:hC6h,ihLq:he|h U>hqhOh% h homhRDhYh6h+UhrhjV)  ?@*+J & Fgd9}gdJ:  & F7$8$H$gdO gd U>  & F7$8$H$gdrgdr  & F7$8$H$gd U> ,1h/ =!"#$% 666666666vvvvvvvvv666666>6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666hH6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666662 0@P`p2( 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p 0@P`p8XV~PJ_HmH nH sH tH @`@ NormalCJ_HaJmH sH tH DA D Default Paragraph FontRiR 0 Table Normal4 l4a (k ( 0No List @@@ jV List Paragraph ^m$PK!pO[Content_Types].xmlj0Eжr(΢]yl#!MB;.n̨̽\A1&ҫ QWKvUbOX#&1`RT9<l#$>r `С-;c=1g$ !)O^rC$y@/yH*񄴽)޵߻UDb`}"qۋJחX^)I`nEp)liV[]1M<OP6r=zgbIguSebORD۫qu gZo~ٺlAplxpT0+[}`jzAV2Fi@qv֬5\|ʜ̭NleXdsjcs7f W+Ն7`g ȘJj|h(KD- dXiJ؇(x$( :;˹! I_TS 1?E??ZBΪmU/?~xY'y5g&΋/ɋ>GMGeD3Vq%'#q$8K)fw9:ĵ x}rxwr:\TZaG*y8IjbRc|XŻǿI u3KGnD1NIBs RuK>V.EL+M2#'fi ~V vl{u8zH *:(W☕ ~JTe\O*tHGHY}KNP*ݾ˦TѼ9/#A7qZ$*c?qUnwN%Oi4 =3N)cbJ uV4(Tn 7_?m-ٛ{UBwznʜ"Z xJZp; {/<P;,)''KQk5qpN8KGbe Sd̛\17 pa>SR! 3K4'+rzQ TTIIvt]Kc⫲K#v5+|D~O@%\w_nN[L9KqgVhn R!y+Un;*&/HrT >>\ t=.Tġ S; Z~!P9giCڧ!# B,;X=ۻ,I2UWV9$lk=Aj;{AP79|s*Y;̠[MCۿhf]o{oY=1kyVV5E8Vk+֜\80X4D)!!?*|fv u"xA@T_q64)kڬuV7 t '%;i9s9x,ڎ-45xd8?ǘd/Y|t &LILJ`& -Gt/PK! ѐ'theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsM 0wooӺ&݈Э5 6?$Q ,.aic21h:qm@RN;d`o7gK(M&$R(.1r'JЊT8V"AȻHu}|$b{P8g/]QAsم(#L[PK-!pO[Content_Types].xmlPK-!֧6 -_rels/.relsPK-!kytheme/theme/themeManager.xmlPK-!0C)theme/theme/theme1.xmlPK-! ѐ' theme/theme/_rels/themeManager.xml.relsPK] J  J  J 8@0(  B S  ?^b%'L %L ::::nu7yKfᬎ{n%V^`o()^`.pL^p`L.@ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PL^P`L.^`o()^`.pL^p`L.@ ^@ `.^`.L^`L.^`.^`.PL^P`L.8^8`o()^`. L^ `L. ^ `.x^x`.HL^H`L.^`.^`.L^`L.Kfnu7{n                  @        * % O,ijVYX"^,a5J:Lq:]= U>RQ+< ]{^'azg j=r=w`r6x3C6fqg9}qz\: Jae|O om5J L @"RzJ P@UnknownG*Ax Times New Roman5Symbol3 *Cx Arial7@ CalibriA$BCambria Math qhVVbbq20F F J#HP $P'O 2!xx Kathy LemonOsterling Chico Cat    Oh+'04 px  $,'Kathy LemonOsterling Normal.dotm Chico Cat2Microsoft Macintosh Word@@ W@ Wb ՜.+,0 hp|  'F   Title  !"#$%&()*+,-.1Root Entry F]q31Table WordDocument.SummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8'CompObj` F Microsoft Word 97-2004 DocumentNB6WWord.Document.8